Manufactured during the 1950s by Royal Camera in Tokyo, the Royal 35-M was also re-branded as the Torca, the Ogikon SP, the Luxall, the Unicorn 35, and others. Note the resemblance to the Zeiss Contax. The camera mounted either a 2.8 or 1.9 45mm lens and had shutter speeds ranging from B-1/500.
Don't let the tacky plastic lens cap shown in the photo fool you. Fit and finish on this camera are excellent. It features a superior 10-blade iris; a fairly large viewfinder; a whisper quiet Copal shutter; a self timer; M/X/V flash synch capability with a modern PC socket; and an uncoupled selenium exposure meter, shown in the photo with the light baffle in the bright light position. In dim light you can pop it open to obtain a reading.
Seen from above, the film counter is at the far right in the photo. To its left is the film advance lever. The shutter release button is at 12:00 o'clock next to the exposure meter window and dial.
Marked by the letters "O" and "C," there's a small screw just below and to the right of "35-M." I suspect this screw serves to adjust the exposure meter's needle. If so, it wouldn't make a difference on this particular camera because the meter is kaput. But that's not unusual in older cameras.
Of course, you really don't need a built in exposure meter to capture images with your camera. You can always use a hand held meter.
Alternatively, you can use the "Sunny Sixteen" rule, as I did in the photo at the right. Because the scene was well lit, I set the aperture at f16 and the ISO at the speed of the film I was using, which was 125. If you're not familiar with this technique, you can find plenty of information about it elsewhere.
Even though you probably won't be able to find a user's manual for the Royal 35-M on the Internet, it would be a wonderful addition to your collection...providing, of course that you could find one. Its design is elegant; its mechanics are robust yet quiet; and its lens is more than adequate. As a bonus, it even has strap lugs!
COMING SOON: The T.K.C Windsor
I have recently aquired this particular camera but it doesn't have a battery for the light meter and I don't know which battery it would take so that I might test it to see if the meter actually works. Can you advise?
ReplyDeleteBack in 1959, a Royal 35-M was my first GOOD camera. Sad to say, I either got a lemon or the mechanism was inherently unreliable because I had to return it several times for warranty repair at Haber & Fink in New York, which left me sad and disillusioned. I traded it in for a Topcon rangefinder which always worked but I missed the Royal and I now have one bought on eBay as a reminder of simpler days. I've owned countless cameras since then, but the first ones are the most memorable.
ReplyDelete